King Arthur (Hardback)
Man or Myth?
An article by the author for Dan Snow's History Hit:'The Evidence for King Arthur: Man or Myth?'
The book is an investigation of the evidence for King Arthur based on the earliest written sources rather than later myths and legends.
The evidence is laid out in a chronological order starting from Roman Britain and shows how the legend evolved and at what point concepts such as Camelot, excalibur and Merlin were added.
It covers the historical records from the end of Roman Britain using contemporary sources such as they are, from 400-800, including Gallic Chronicles, Gildas and Bede.
It details the first written reference to Arthur in the Historia Brittonum c800 and the later Annales Cambriae in the tenth century showing the evolution of the legend in in later Welsh and French stories.
The work differs from other books on the subject in not starting from or aiming at a specific person. It compares the possibility of Arthur being purely fictional with an historical figure alongside a list of possible suspects.
The evidence is presented and the reader is invited to make up their own mind before a discussion of the Author’s own assessment.
Although complex and heavy, it was a great, thought-provoking reading. The author left no stone unturned and no possibility unexplained.NetGalley, Alan D.D.
Rating: 5 out of 5 starsNetGalley, Anna Maria Giacomasso
I'm sucker of everything related to King Arthur and I found this book informative and interesting.
It's full of facts and interesting ideas, well written and engrossing.
Rating: 5 out of 5 starsNetGalley, Melissa Smith
I have always been a sucker for Arthurian stories and I was thoroughly impressed with this book. Mr. Sullivan has discussed in great detail the many Arthurian stories and even provided a form of timeframe to keep track as you read.
King Arthur: Man or Myth? by Tony Sullivan is an intriguing exploration of Arthurian legend and British history. I particularly like that this book gives consideration to all options, the skeptical and the mythical, when trying to piece together real life history. Plus, it's laid out in chronological order which made it a bit easier to keep up.NetGalley, Lauren Stoolfire
I've always been fascinated by King Arthur (thanks, Dad!), so when the opportunity came to read and review this book, I couldn't resist. I wasn't disappointed. I think the author was very brave to tackle this subject in the way that he did. There is a huge jumble surrounding the history/myth/legend of "King" Arthur - manuscripts, "histories" that don't match, and even a stone engraving... The only reason I gave this book 4 stars, rather than 5, is because it has given me far too much to think about!NetGalley, Dawn Lewis
A very good read for those interested in the early history of "Britain" or those who hear the words "King Arthur" and get a gleam in their eye.